Claiming back time

So, this Making Thinking Visible stuff sounds brilliant right? Something that makes explicit what we hope we are teaching by osmosis.

But how do we put that thinking stuff into place, in our time-poor, curriculum driven classrooms?

We all have deadlines to meet, outcomes to check off, programs to write - I know, I'm in the same boat. We are already trying to put too much stuffing into the bloated chicken that is teaching, and just when you think you've done it all, someone tells you to throw a fancy Masterchef style garnish on top too.

This is where the mindset shift for us as teachers is essential - by making thinking visible to ourselves and our students, we gain time in our classrooms.

Big call, I know. So, let's take a quick dip into the ocean that is Visible Thinking and make the thinking behind that statement visible, by using a Thinking Routine (a thinking strategy to encourage understanding - the basis of the teacher's toolkit of Visible Thinking).  

This is called Claim-Support-Question - a routine designed to consider all aspects of a statement (and a great one for encouraging critical thinking!).

So, the claim is: Making Thinking Visible allows teachers to gain time in classrooms.

What can we use to support this claim?

• By using thinking routines, we are able to gain information about student thinking patterns, allowing for on the spot formative assessment 
• Creating a Culture of Thinking encourages students to share their thinking and ideas, facilitating collaboration between peers and allowing for students to teach each other rather than direct teacher instruction
• By making the thinking behind ideas visible, teachers explicitly teach students easy strategies to analyse concepts in depth, developing a deep knowledge and understanding of topics rather than a surface understanding that can be applied across disciplines.

Ok, sounds great right? But there is two sides to every story, and using this routine allows us to consider all aspects instead of blindly accepting the claim - a skill that we often wish to cultivate in our students.

What questions could we pose about this claim?

• How about the time it takes to get started? Surely there is time that must be put into setting up these routines and cultivating the thinking needed?
• What about the time needed to up skill staff in developing the language associated around routines? Who will do it and how?
• What if my school already has a 'big idea' its pursuing? How can I fit Visible Thinking into previously established structures?

I'm sure there are others we can ask to pose against the claim. The short answer to all these? Time spent well is time gained. If we invest a teeny tiny bit of our time now in figuring out how to create a culture of thinking in our classrooms, we can be paid back ten fold in the time we gain from the collaborative and constructive environment Visible Thinking creates. 

The skills that we want students to develop as 21st Century learners - critical and creative thinking, questioning, risk taking, persevering, communicating, reflecting (this is starting to sound like the IB Learner Profile...) - are facilitated by deep thinking and become naturally embedded in our teaching through the use of the Routines. They are a teaching tool, not an extra activity.

Now that is brilliant. 

Find me online!

twitter: @bswain1

email:missswain24@gmail.com

pintrest:https://www.pinterest.com/bswain14

or comment below!

That 'thinking' stuff

"My students are too young/too low/too busy. There is no way they can do this 'thinking' stuff"

In my class we have a rule when faced with a problem - RTQ x 2 (Read the Question Twice). So go on, read that above statement again.

Now, cut off the first part of that statement and focus on the second part.

"There is no way they can do this 'thinking' stuff"

Taken in isolation, that statement is a little bit ridiculous. Unless you're teaching a class of rocks, every single one of them is doing this 'thinking' stuff every minute of every day. ( Although, I'm sure your rock class might be doing it too - maybe you have the G&T rocks).

I'm the first to admit that when I came in contact with Visible Thinking, I saw the Thinking Routines as an activity that I could easily slide into my program, and then VOILA my students would be visible thinkers. I think this is an experience that is commonly shared by those first bitten by the VT bug. It's new, it's exciting, and we think it will be a bandaid that will cover all the 'thinking stuff' in our classroom.

If there's one thing (or one seashell) that I took away from Project Zero Classroom, it's that there is absolutely no point 'doing' Thinking Routines and then saying "Look! My student's thinking is visible, now let's move on." The process of Making Thinking Visible in learning is not something that  can be easily changed overnight, or just done once then moved on from. 

Making Thinking Visible in your classroom requires a mindset shift from you too.

Lev Vygotsky, advocate for constructivist-based pedagogy, is often quoted as saying:

 "Children grow into the intellectual life of those around them". 

In other words, the intellectual world we model for our students is what shapes their own perceptions of the value of thinking. If you don't value deep thinking, then your students won't either!

So, how do we start showing students that developing more than a surface understanding of concepts is vital to nurturing intellectual development? By creating a Culture of Thinking in our classrooms.

A concept coined by Ron Ritchhart, key researcher of the Making Thinking Visible project at Project Zero (Click here to learn more about Ron and MTV), a Culture of Thinking is a place where thinking is visible, valued and actively promoted for all members.

Let's break that down further.

In order to create a Culture of Thinking - an environment where children understand the importance of deep understanding and intellectual fluency, we need to consider the three concepts in isolation.

Thinking is Visible - Assessing understanding of abstract concepts, or things that can't be measured through a test score is tricky. So how the %$!* do we assess thinking? By making thinking visible, the process of developing understanding is made accessible to both teacher and students, as well as parties outside the classroom. Teachers are able to garner the thinking process students are undergoing (which is great for formative assessment!) and students are able to reflect on their process of understanding.  Most importantly, all parties get insight into how the learning is occurring.

Thinking is Valued - Why do your students not put up their hands when you know they have a pretty good idea of the  answer? Well, number one, you might be asking the wrong kind of question, but, in addition, is students do not feel their thinking is valued, they aren't going to put their necks out to risk humiliation. A Culture of Thinking in a classroom values the process and effort of developing understanding, and encourages students to share their thinking practices with others, even if their thinking is not yet fully developed. It encourages students to share their steps towards developing a full understanding, and encourages the idea that mistakes are just stepping stones in thinking.

Thinking is Actively Promoted - There is no such thing as no time for thinking. Every interaction, every discussion, every question is an opportunity to promote and encourage  students to share their thinking. Talking about thinking, sharing thinking, reflecting on thinking - we encourage this naturally through our teaching, but we need to do it consciously and purposefully and, more importantly, we need to make it visible to our students.

I know right. It makes a lot of sense. It's ok. Take a second to push those brains back inside your skull and regroup. I know I needed too when the VT bus first hit me. Head on collision. Brains everywhere.

So the next big question is how. How do we create a Culture of Thinking in our learning environments? (whether it be classrooms, schools, districts, homes or other educational settings) Lucky, Ron hasn't left us in the lurch. He and his partner in crime Mark Church have teamed up to give us a whole lot of resources to help us make thinking visible, which I'll run through over my next few posts.

Now, as all great members of my class do, RTQ x 2. Go back and read that again so you can start thinking about your thinking, and how valued, visible and actively promoted thinking is in your learning environment. 

As always, feel free to comment, email me (missswain24@gmail.com) or tweet me (@bswain1) with questions, queries or comments. :)